Had a few interesting experiences with commenting on blogs recently that got me thinking about blog comments and its still pretty patchy how we are approaching it. They are the essential lifeblood of audience engagement, especially for bloggers as they take the experience from a click statistic to a conversation.
I admit, I haven’t exactly taken to blogging like the proverbial duck to water and I gave a lot of thought about comments; what to use, whether to moderate and all that when I started to blog and I wrote about my thoughts in previous posts – Community and Comments and Any Comments.
I gave Reddit a go and Disqus, both excellent – but I have settled on using the functionality built into WordPress and a bit of spam filtering – which is working for me.
The first thing that jogged me back into thinking about comments was Chris Brogans blog, his article on Audience is King – he describes the fact that the value of a blog is all about the audience. In the comments the value of the discussion at some point probably outweighed the original few paragraphs that Chris penned – nicely making his point.
(Ironically in researching the opposite opinion, that content is king, I found a blog about content without a comment function at all).
Clearly neither Content nor Audience is really ‘king’ – a point that then comes out in the discussion around that article, it’s a symbiotic relationship – the content sows the seeds for the community or an audience that forms around it.
Content also has a pivotal role in search engine optimisation and you got to have a bit of that to be found by your audience via Google.
Anyway, back to my point – the next experience that had me thinking about comments was when I commented on a blog post at CMSWatch. Like a good CMSWatch tribe citizen, I authenticated with IntenseDebate (who I’d previously registered with, so that I could leave a comment there) and typed away.
Job done, right? My brilliantly crafted contribution to this subject inserted – let the engagement begin. But no. Hang on. It needs to be moderated.
Hmm… a moderated conversation, not really in the spirit of social media, but I can understand why I guess, I too have had that ‘moderate posts’ box ticked, as I felt my way with this blogging stuff.
The trouble was that it then took six hours for the comment to be moderated and the moment is lost. We are all so used to Twitter I guess that this just seemed like an enternity. So if you need to moderate, you need to do it fast (I have switched off moderation).
I also felt that having to jump through the hoop of registering, the login process and the fact that I’d commented before should have made me slightly more trusted than ‘anonymous’. This is not the way to build trusted engagement communities.
I also think (hope!) that there is something you can show your audience about yourself by skillfully handling unfavourable posts, or maybe (even better) that your community will do it for you.
Third thing, I read this article on The Next Web by Mike Braco, that talks about cross posting – in it he writes:
the more places you submit your content, the more spread out and less valuable the conversation around it becomes.
Which I have found to a certain extent – reposting on the this-is-marketing blog and here, although I would say ‘fractured’ rather than less valuable as I have appreciated the feedback in both places. There are two audiences for these blogs, but it would be great to merge the discussion.
It’s something to think about when reposting, maybe it’s something to think about ahead of generating the content, where do you want to have a conversation about this?
But hang on… you can’t control the centrality of the discussion, it’ll happen somewhere else whether you like it or not – Twitter? FaceBook? LinkedIn? I think the key here must be to let your audience know where the conversation might be – where you and your audience digitally hang out.
So, comments – feels to me like you should open up and not moderate comments, but reserve the right to delete. If you insist on moderating, do it quickly and consider trusting folks that have commented before or bothered to authenticate. Think about your audience and any possible discussion when deciding where to post.
Fancy more of this?
Subscribe to my Rockstar CMO Newsletter
CMO at Spotler Group, advisor at Storyblok and Orange Logic and founder of Rockstar CMO. Not a rock star, but I am a marketing strategist, content marketer, columnist, speaker, industry watcher, but most of all; creator of ART (Awareness, Revenue, and Trust) for the companies I work with.
You can find me on LinkedIn, Twitter , or listen to my weekly podcast at Rockstarcmo.com
The half-baked thoughts shared on this blog may not reflect those of my employer or clients, and if the topic of this article is interesting or you just want to say hello please get in touch.
4 thoughts on “Blog Comments and Engagement”
I agree with you, the less moderation the better. On my personal blog, I started out (as many people do, I suspect) in fully-locked-down mode — no comments allowed. Then I opened it up to moderated comments — but only for registered commenters. I’ve long since dropped all restrictions. Anyone can comment on anything I write, anonymously or not. I do get a lot of anonymous comments, but they’re more often well-intentioned than not. The ones that are super-shrill or over-the-top angry, etc., I just leave in place since they usually say more about the commenter than about me. I’ve removed only two comments so far this year (out of 300+ total comments). Both of those were because of profanity.
Conversations are funny things. You can try to muzzle them, but they don’t entirely go away. They just happen somewhere else.
Agree completely. I don’t moderate anything. Like you, just running WordPress with Akismet as a spam filter. Good thing too. Since I launched, I’ve had about 300 real comments and 1500 spam comments. Akismet has only ever let through 1 spam comment, and has blocked 2 genuine ones. I don’t even remove profanity comments, seeing I’ve been known to use the odd four letter word in my posts anyway.
In fact, I’m starting to think a reason I get quite a few comments is because my posts are so random, informal and full of rubbish. If something is neat and perfect, people are scared to comment as they worry they’ll mess it up. If it is already a mess …
@Kas Thomas – It is about confidence I agree, when I started I was cautious. Which is why the CMSWatch example seems so odd – this is a confident organisation that has no problem in resolutely expressing and defending it’s views. I really think that Twitter is perhaps the agent of change here, we expect to have the conversation now!
Also, great point – comments do, good or bad, absolutely reflect on the one making the comment rather than the blogger, again it’s probably a confidence thing to let that happen.
@Jon Marks Thanks Jon – Yep, bang on – Akismet is doing an awesome job “Akismet has caught 1,866 spam for you since you first installed it”
I like your self effacing “random, informal and full of rubbish” – your blog is a good read, interesting and it sounds like “you” – that’s what attracts the comments.
Which I guess is a great point that nobody makes about attracting comments; you need to sound like you want a conversation – you need to attract a crowd and then let them feel like they can contribute. Plus, give them some thing they can get stuck into like – how the cloud is a crock of shit 😉
Comments are closed.